Over the course of my life, since the early 60’s, it became evident that I had an interest in a certain type of characters and certain types of stories involving talking and anthropomorphic animals, both in serious stories and comedic cartoons. There were no other defining parameters to my interest. I just dug the heck out of Furry characters, as I sometimes called them.
I was not aware of anyone else having this interest until around 2003, when I discovered that there was a large appreciation society on the net for this type of character that was also calling them Furries, and themselves Furry Fandom.
But this internet society was in disarray and suffering much confusion about how to define an interest on which very little had been written, and which certain media sources seemed all too willing to spread misinformation about for the sake of gaining ratings through sensationalism.
The interest itself is, of course, not sensational at all. It’s about as geeky and as disinteresting to outsiders as most other fantasy based fandoms. Yet it’s an easy target for attacks due to the fact that very little is written about it. So I basically thought I ought to write something that would help define it.
So, what exactly is “Furry?” The word itself is commonly used as an adjective to describe anything having fur or a furry quality? Furry Fandom uses the word similarly to refer to a type of fantasy character - one that is generally part animal and part human. But there is no qualifying amount of either required for the mix. It is not even required that the character have fur, as long as it can be described as an animal with human attributes. Furry is a fandom for people who like the types of characters they judge as having this "Furry" quality of being an animal that in some way reflects the human condition from an alternate perspective.
Now, if you’re one of the uninitiated, you’re probably scratching your head wondering who these characters are and if they relate to anything you might have seen or read before. Well, chances are they do. Chances are you’ll be quite surprised when you find out the characters this fandom idolizes, and you’ll probably wonder why you never noticed a relationship between them, or why it took so long for them to get a name under which they could be recognized as having some relationship.
Basically it is like this. Think of how some people are pet owners, some forest rangers, others veterinarians. These three things are unique enough that you wouldn’t necessarily connect them, until you hold a convention of general animal lovers and representatives of all three show up.
So it is in the world of fantasy entertainment. There are fans of animal characters in comic strips, fans of animal characters in children’s entertainment, fans of animal characters in science fiction, fans of animals in arts and crafts, fans of animal mascots in sports, and so on and so forth. And normally you wouldn’t assume a connection, until you hold a convention for general animal characters in art and literature, and fans from all over the entertainment spectrum start gathering to celebrate this idea.
In fact, the idea proved so far reaching that it may attract the pet owners, forest rangers, and veterinarians, as well as people interested in animal related religions and many other things involving animals, because anyone who likes or works with animals in any way can potentially find something appealing in this animal related art.
Thus, we are dealing with a potentially huge fandom here - tens of thousands of people like myself who have this general interest in animal characters who haven’t yet discovered that there are others with similar interest who are making a connection on the internet or at conventions.
Therefore, I want to write a document that describes the interest, gives an idea of the scope of what the interest includes, and is inviting to those who might be interested in seeking out others like themselves that they can share the interest with.
Below are some terms that are relevant to the Furry interest.
“Funny Animals,” a term coined at least as far back as the 1900’s, but possibly much earlier. A possible origin of the term “Funny Animals” is the word “Funnies” which is used to refer to comic strips. As in “The Sunday Funnies.” This became a term used to refer to all comic strips and comic art, including the more serious political cartoons and soap opera strips. The term “Funny Animals” may have come about as a way of referring to animal characters in The Funnies.
Evidence of the relationship between the two terms can be found in the titles of the animal character comic books of the 1940’s. Titles like Fawcett’s Funny Animals and Walter Lantz’ New Funnies tend to use the terms interchangeably. This seems to suggest that comic books in those days strongly identified with the term “Funnies,” and since there was a different market for animal comics than for superhero or soap type comics, “Animal” began to be seen commonly in front of the term “Funnies,” until it was ultimately modified to “Funny Animals.”
But did this begin in the 1940’s, or in the 1900’s? The comic books of the 40’s do not explain an earlier genre of children’s books called “Funny Animals,” practiced by more than one author. In fact, animal stories for children in the early part of the 20th century were extremely prolific, as were animal comic strips. Animal characters seem to have taken the world by storm almost from the very inception of the comics - the funnies.
“Fabulous Monsters,” a term that goes back as far as Lewis Carroll. This term primarily refers to mythical beasts such as unicorns, gryphons and such. Actually, this term is rarely used anymore, "Mythical Beasts" having replaced it in the popular vocabulary.
“Anthropomorphic Characters,” a term made popular in the 1980’s and 90’s by a movement in the comic book industry attempting to repackage Funny Animals and sell them to a new audience.
“Anthropomorphic” means like man. So anything given a relatively human shape, the ability to speak human language, think human thoughts or feel human emotions has been anthropomorphosized.
Many robots and alien life forms in science fiction are anthropomorphic. Even a talking Pepsi bottle in a commercial is anthropomorphic. God, also, is considered to be anthropomorphic. Thus, a true anthropomorphics fandom would be a wonder indeed. But that is not what we have here.
What we have is a specific interest in anthropomorphic animal people. Though, when you get into a title like The Wizard Of Oz and you see the lion sandwiched in between The Tin Man and The Scarecrow, all three are anthropomorphic, and it's difficult to see why anyone who had an interest in one wouldn't have an interest in all three.
What actually tends to happen with this interest is that even a single anthropomorphic animal in a film, book or other work of art creates an interest in all the surrounding elements of the story. And therefore, even though the lion is of special interest to a Furry fan, the other characters are not necessarily of lesser interest.
This is an unusual aspect of the Furry interest. It is not necessarily an interest in anything that could be properly defined as a genre, but rather, like the word “furry” itself, “Furry” becomes an adjective to other genres. It is something that is added to an existing formula that takes it into an unknown dimension, an alternate reality that is especially useful in the expression of allegory.
“Cartoon Animal,” which is the most widely used term used by animators and animation enthusiasts, when they feel compelled to use any term at all. Or, as Roy Disney might ask, “Do we have any animal movies in the works?”
When you sit around watching the bonus features on these new Disney double DVD sets as I do, you often hear the animators speak of the animal character in a different context from the human characters. But you never hear the terms “Anthropomorphic” or “Funny Animals,” as some of the more learned babblers on the net would have you expect.
Like everyone else in the world, save for the technically obsessed, Disney animators have never needed to think of animal characters as having some specific genus name within the arts. Their art is most often the entirety of the animation process, though there are some animators who specialize in the animal characters. Actually, Walt Disney himself was a specialist in animal characters.
But, on the whole, when the average Joe is reading Garfield with his morning coffee, he’s not looking at an anthropomorphic animal, a funny animal, a cartoon animal or even a Furry. To the world, Garfield is just a cat. Awareness of anything else he might be in a technical respect is suspended along with all other disbelief.
This is the true wonder of Furry characters, as well as the biggest problem for their fans. The average person sees Garfield as a cat and Snoopy as a dog. Other than general comics, they don’t see anything shared between Snoopy and Garfield to be a fan of. Nor do they necessarily understand why someone would specifically be a fan of comics with animals in them and not other comics. What’s the special appeal of these animal characters, they want to know. And in the answering of this question is where fans tend to get over technical and scare people with a lot of terms they’ve never heard applied to the common cartoon animal before.
Cartoon animals were never intended to be looked at that closely. In fact, the more you analyze them, the more they’re effect is diminished. The whole idea of their use in the arts is to create the illusion that they are real animals with people personalities. This enables them to be funny, to make a political point, or to communicate a socially relevant message through allegory. But if you’re sitting there thinking in terms of, “Fival is 75% human, 5% mouse and 20% pure cartoon exaggeration, you’re not getting the intended effect of the animator’s craft. The animator wants you to perceive Fival as a mouse. End of story.
The term “Toon,” made popular in the movie “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,“ is also relevant. Though it may refer to any type of cartoon character, Furry or otherwise. As with "Anthropomorphic," "Toon" eludes to a much larger fandom of general animation enthusiasts. But just about every Furry is a toon of some kind, or can be drawn as a toon.
"Allegorical Literature." This is the actual genre of authors like Richard Adams and Richard Bach, though the term is rarely bandied about in fan circles. It's a term only an intellectually inclined fan would know, and intellectuals are a minority in most fandoms. However, just like "Toon" and "Anthropomorphic," "Allegorical Literature" is a big genre above and beyond its inclusion of talking animal stories.
However, it is probably the most crucial venue for Furry stories to reach an adult, intellectual audience. Anthropomorphic animals have been the stars of intellectual fables since the days of Aesop, leading one to wonder if Aesop was the first Furry fan. But, given the penchant of primitive civilizations to anthropomorphize animals, regarding them as gods and spirit guides and such, I tend to think it’s just a part of human nature that has always been there. Humans have just always loved to feed their own feelings into an animal character and admire the counter perspective.
"Alien Life Forms." It's a frequently used device in sci-fi and fantasy to use the attributes of animals to create an alien life form. But sci-fi generally does not draw a distinction between an animal derived alien and an alien that looks mostly human. Nor even an alien that is a nondescript blob riding around in a trash can with a plunger for an eye. They’re all ALF’s
A Furry ALF is usually furbearing, like a Wookee or Ewok. These are original creatures, but do bear a resemblance to certain animal types. This can get you looking around at all the other anthropomorphic creatures in Star Wars and wondering which ones should be considered Furry characters. Is Yoda a Furry, or Jar Jar Binks? What about the insects? There’s nothing in the outline of The Furry Interest to preclude insects, anymore than dragons.
Yes, looking at Star Wars that way could take Furry into some scary territory. Fortunately you don’t have to look at it that way. Wookees and Ewoks are Furry. That automatically pulls the whole Star Wars saga under The Furry Umbrella, and it no longer matters whether you regard the other ALF’s as Furry or just supporting players, because nobody watches Star Wars just for the Wookies and Ewoks. What you buy is the total package with the Furry element as just one attractive feature.
How important that Furry element is varies from individual to individual. But for myself I can attest that Star Wars was already into it’s 3rd movie before I took any interest in it. It was not until the ewoks got their own cartoon series that a Furry interest was created, and thus a desire to give the movie series a serious chance.
"Humanimal." This is a term that has been used to describe the mostly human looking animal hybrids and spirit beasts seen in Japanese Animation. The only visible animal attributes being ears and tails, while the main animal aspect of the character is revealed through personality.
The Japanese perspective on Furry can be quite different and go against the grain of what the average Furry fan has come to expect. But in the end it does nothing more harmful than add a new dimension of possibilities to what already seemed a limitless pallet.
"Mascot." This term has two relevant definitions. A mascot can be the animal character that represents a sports team or a product. Or it can be used to refer to those cute critters in Japanese Animation which may or may not talk, and are usually a pet of the main human character.
This brings up questions which are sometimes thrown at me, like, "Does anyone really watch Sailor Moon just for the cats?" "Does The Geico Gecko actually have fans?" And “Does anyone actually collect The Baltimore Oriole or The Fox Chevrolet Fox?”
Well, yes. There are actually a number of anime titles that wouldn't be of such great interest without the fantasy elements added by their cute critter mascots. And some Tenchi Muyo fans may list Ryo-okki as their favorite character. Likewise, Gecko fandom exists, just like there was a Taco Bell Dog fandom.
People aren't necessarily aware of getting caught up in these fandoms that develop around sidekick animals or advertising characters, but one day they just turn around and notice that they've become a Gecko collector, and if they see something with that character's likeness on it, they just have to have it. And, of course, if you root for a certain sports team, the image of the team mascot tends to represent something special to you.
Furry fans may not only enjoy collecting toys and artistic representations of mascots, some even enjoy creating their own mascot costumes and wearing them at conventions, or to entertain children in hospitals.
Finally, the terms "Furry" and “Furries” used to refer both to Furry characters and the fans thereof. Why is it necessary to have these additional terms when all of the above terms already exist?
As you can see, all of the above terms are attached to certain specific aspects of the Furry interest. But none of them accurately describe a person whose interest tends to span some or all of the above aspects due to a specific interest in the one thing that they all have in common - which is fantasy animal characters. Thus a Furry fan is properly described as a person who enjoys literature and art involving fantasy animal characters regardless of what genre or aspect of popular culture they spring from.
So, how do you know if you’re a Furry? What’s the rule? Actually, there isn’t one. Being a Furry is purely to do with a segment of pop culture. You could be a fan of moldy oranges and call yourself a Furry. No one would be able to stop you. In fact, if you were persistent enough, you could set up your fan club for moldy oranges in the online Furry community, attract a following and demand a right to set up at Furry conventions. As long as you were respectful of all the other groups doing the same thing I doubt anyone would stop you.
Don’t laugh. If you can sell working gun replicas at anime cons, you can do just about anything. But, I find it disconcerting trying to deal with every little group that sets up in the community to promote their unique spin on what Furry means to them. So I’m trying to restrict this document to the most well defined and accepted definition of what Furry is all about, and that I regard to be the Ursa Major Award’s criteria for the awards they present at Furry conventions. That criteria being anything in any field of the arts that features at least one anthropomorphic animal.
So let’s rephrase the question to how do you know if you’re a fan of what Ursa Major gives awards to? Ok, in this an obsessive interest is not necessary. You don’t have to be exclusively interested in comics with animals in them. You can like others just as well. But, if you like the cartoon critters enough to be especially attracted to a new comic just because of an animal character, you might be a Furry fan.
If you have a shelf of animated movies, arrange them in order of the ones you like best. If you find the animal movies leaning towards your favorite side, you might be a Furry fan.
Mind you, animals tend to dominate feature animation to a great extent. Even a movie like Pinocchio has Figaro. So, odds are pretty good that, if you’re a general animation fan, you may have a natural gravity towards Furry characters. Robotech and other giant robo and power suit type anime fans may be excluded from this probability. There is as deep a contrast between Disney type animation and most anime as there was between Funny Animal comics and Superhero comics.
Anyway, if you find yourself watching Pinocchio, and you realize Figaro is a major attraction of this film, you might be a Furry fan. If you then feel compelled to buy a Figaro plushie the next time you walk past The Disney Store, odds of you being at least a part time Furry fan are getting pretty high.
But what if you don’t get that feeling for Figaro. What if you don’t get that feeling until you see The Secret Of NIMH and fall head over heels in love with Mrs. Brisby? You then have to go out and buy every piece of Secret of NIMH merchandise you can get your hands on, burning up Ebay looking for the stuff and spending hundreds of bucks a month on it. Congratulations, you just zoomed right past Furry fan and zoomed all the way up to Furry Otaku. But don’t worry. Those are pretty rare. You’re probably not one of those.
All kidding aside. The only thing really required to be a Furry is to in some way like Furry characters. It’s not in anyway an exclusive fandom. So if you just like general animation, science fiction and/or allegorical fantasy, chances are you’ve seen these animal characters and enjoyed their exploits enough to enjoy seeing more. And the more you want to see, the more of a Furry you are.
But what if you suddenly realize you’re a Furry. Is this a bad thing?
Friend, if you’re into general animation, or even general sci-fi and fantasy, there are people who will say it’s bad. And they’ll find any excuse to put you down for it, legitimate or not.
They’ll say it’s a frivolous waste of time and money, which is entirely true. But then so is golf, or sitting in front of your TV watching a bunch of guys kick a ball around a field. Basically everybody needs some kind of hobby to frivolously waste money and time on. Hobbies are a healthy part of life, and therefore not actually frivolous at all. The main function of a hobby is stress relief. And in this stressful world you need all the relief you can get.
They’ll say, “A person your age liking cartoons or comics of any sort is a sign of immaturity.” But in this day and age it has become much more common. And since there is also some highly respectable history involved in this interest, as well as great value in some of the collectibles, you can laugh all the way to the bank at these comments.
They’ll say that this fantasy animal fandom is attractive to one or more socially undesirable elements. And I won’t sugar coat this for you, it is. There aren’t a whole lot of segments of the human race this interest doesn’t reach out to to some extent. Therefore, you are likely to meet just about anybody while traveling in Furry circles. Some people you will most likely wish you hadn’t met, but most you would probably be sad if you missed.
I find this to be equally true of all fandoms I’ve ever belonged to, and it is especially true of the internet itself. These undesirable characters (trolls, griefers, unhinged fanatics, etc.) are out there. The only way to effectively avoid meeting them is to never get the internet and never attend any kind of public event. But if you let them keep you from meeting the people who would enhance your life, you lose out big time.
Ultimately, a fandom is what you make of it. If you keep what enhances your life and chuck the parts that don't, being part of any fandom should be a good thing that brings you much happiness and enjoyment. And Furry is no exception to this rule.
The Furry interest encompasses all types of fictional or artistically expressed animal characters with humanized features, all of which fall under the umbrella term “Furry” or “Furries.”
A character need not have been brought to life on TV, in the movies or in literature to be considered a Furry. It can be your animal derived role playing character or online alter ego, an animal character brought to life through a costume worn at live events such as ball games, amusement parks or conventions, or it can be any number of characters expressed by the creators of plush toys, figurine collectibles or any type of artistic rendering.
Basically, any time a character or image is created, for whatever purpose, that combines any mixture of human and animal attributes, it’s a “Furry Character,” or a “Furry” for short.
Among other things too numerous to mention, The Furry Umbrella covers such characters and titles as
Snoopy & Woodstock,
Garfield,
Mickey Mouse,
Bugs Bunny,
Kimba The White Lion,
Tony The Tiger,
The Trix Rabbit,
Bambi,
Lady & The Tramp,
Charlotte's Web,
Watership Down,
Jonathan Livingston Seagull,
The Little Prince,
My Little Pony,
Luna & Artimas from Sailor Moon,
Ryo-okki from Tenchi Muyo,
Felicia from Darkstalkers,
Rocky & Bullwinkle,
The Cinnamon Bear,
Amazing 3,
The Secret Of NIMH,
The Plague Dogs,
Redwall,
Spellsinger,
The Apprentice Adept,
Xanth,
Dracula,
The Wolfman,
Dark Shadows,
Doctor Who,
Star Wars,
Monchichis,
The Get Along Gang,
Warner Brothers Cartoons,
Care Bears,
Unico,
Hello Kitty,
Fawcetts Funny Animals Comic Books,
Mother Goose & Brother’s Grimm Fairy Tales,
Sonic The Hedgehog,
Starfox,
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,
Shanda The Panda,
Furrlough,
Albedo,
Elfquest,
ALF,
Spiderman,
Batman,
Howard The Duck,
Fritz The Cat,
Omaha The Cat Dancer,
Foamy The Squirrel,
The Last Unicorn,
The Flight Of Dragons,
Alice In Wonderland,
The Wizard Of Oz,
The Jungle Book,
The Chronicles Of Narnia,
Dragon Half,
Slayers,
and scads of other anime titles that feature Furry mascots and kitty or bunny girls.
Anthropomorphic characters also appear in music, as in Prokofiev’s “Peter And The Wolf.” Or as in Andrew Lloyd Webber’s “Cats.”
You will even find anthropomorphic animals in rock music, as in “The Hare Who Lost His Spectacles” by Jethro Tull or “All In A Mouse’s Night” by Genesis.
An anthropomorphic character need not have fur to be considered a “Furry." Reptile and bird characters are also considered Furries, because they are still considered to be animals, whether they have fur, feathers, bare skin or scales.
Alien life forms are often considered Furries, especially if they do have fur or are relative to some known animal type. And mythological beasts such as unicorns and dragons fall into the “Furry” category as well.
Fairies, elves, angels, mermaids, werewolves, vampires and such may also be included under The Furry Umbrella, since they all are distinguished by having animal features, such as wings, fangs and pointed ears.
A “Furry” can even be a mechanical creature, such as K-9, the robot dog from “Doctor Who.” Or it can be an inanimate object given a human voice and personality, such as the animated candle stick, clock and cups in Disney’s "Beauty & The Beast."
That might seem to be stretching the literal value of the term “Furries” a bit. To rationalize this you must remember that the Furry interest is not literally about things with fur. It is about the anthropomorphism of animal life forms.
Looking at it technically, by giving a candle stick a human personality and the ability to move and speak in an animal fashion, it becomes a new kind of living humanized animal life form that is difficult to distinguish from more obviously animal derived characters.
The overall Furry Fandom is more inclined towards inclusion than exclusion in such disputes, the point being rendered mute by the fact that a main character in "Beauty And The Beast" is an obviously classic Furry character, thus automatically classifying it as a Furry movie according to the Ursa Major criteria.
Outside the fandom this would more properly be considered a work of general anthropomorphics, but Furry is a label that belongs exclusively to the Furry Fandom. It is not a term subject to dictionary definition or recognition by the general public. In other words, to a Furry fan, if it walks like a Furry and talks like a Furry enough to push the button of his or her Furry interest, it might as well be a Furry.
So, you might ask, what is not a “Furry?” Any character that is completely human or completely animal is not often considered a “Furry.” Lassie is generally not considered a “Furry,” because she has no humanized features, does not talk and exhibits no intelligence that is not attributable to a normal animal. On the other hand, Mr. Ed is a “Furry,” because he speaks human language and exhibits human intelligence.
However, this logic is completely defeated the minute somebody comes up with an old Lassie comic book and says, "This sure looks Furry to me." This appreciation of Lassie as a cartoon character can then be transposed onto the real world animal actor, and just like that Lassie is a Furry. (Note: Furry is a fandom. Never expect the logic of a fandom to be practical, definitive or to make a whole heck of a lot of sense.)
Defining things from the more human end of the spectrum is a little more difficult. Let’s use superheroes as a prime example of how human characters do or don’t find space under The Furry Umbrella. Superman, Thor, Captain America, The Shadow, Sailor Moon, etc. are not “Furries.” But Spiderman, Batman, Catwoman, Daredevil, etc. can all be considered of Furry interest, because they wear costumes based on animal esthetics, and/or exhibit animal derived powers. Even Josie And The Pussycats can loosely be considered “Furries,” because the cat ears and tails don’t have to be real to push the buttons of a Furry fan’s interest. In fact, the creator of Josie & The Pussycats is a frequent guest at Furry conventions.
Furries are a long endeared and generally harmless part of human culture throughout most of the world. They are loved for their ability to express cuteness, comedy and an air of fantasy that is foreign to normal human thought.
Furries are so common in our society that you see them everyday and hardly take note of them. For example: here in the Baltimore area an anthropomorphic fox will sell you a Chevrolet, while an anthropomorphic gecko sells you car insurance, and an anthropomorphic tiger fills your gas tank. Then, just so your car won’t get stolen, an anthropomorphic dog will help you take a bite out of crime.
Funny Animal characters challenge the imaginations of children. They make adults see the humor in world events through newspaper comic strips. They adorn the packaging of many products commonly purchased by American consumers. And they frequently are used in the telling of allegorical, religious and philosophical fables.
Indeed, it is practically impossible for anyone to have grown up in America during the last 100 or so years without encountering Furry characters and being positively effected by them.
This chronology is a perpetual work in progress. If you see I’ve missed anything, please do E-mail me about it.
Furry characters go back to mythological times. Many gods of early civilizations were anthropomorphic characters. Furries figure prominently in ancient Egyptian art, Native American art, and the art of many other ancient cultures. Actually, there is even a modicum of Furriness in The Bible, as well as general Christian culture.
The unicorn is historically a favored icon in Christianity, representing virtue. And angels are also Furries when they are imaged as humans with wings. I have known Christians to more avidly collect angel and unicorn figurines than some Furry fans collect plushies.
Also, let us not forget how much Christians identify with lions. So much so that Christian organizations have not only supported “The Chronicles Of Narnia,” they also sponsored the revival of “Kimba The White Lion.”
Something many Furry fans include among their interests and/or use as a reference is Aesop’s Fables, which dates back to around 500 BC. Yes, apparently the Furry interest really is that old. Many a Furry fan claims to have thrilled to the telling of such tales as “The Fox And The Grapes,” “The Ant And The Grasshopper,” “The Lion And The Mouse” and “The Tortoise And The Hare.” Which is not surprising, since many of these tales are frequently referred to or parodied in the animated films of the last hundred years or so.
It is also interesting to note that the earliest sighted example of Furry characters in literature is a work of allegorical philosophy. As you will see, this perception of talking animals as allegorical teachers of philosophy, faith, history and the state of the human condition sticks with them to the present day.
For some 2 millennia beyond Aesop, the history of Furry characters becomes difficult to chronicle. Furry fables litter the folk culture of practically every civilization that existed during those centuries. But few can be attributed to their actual authors before the 1800’s. And this is where our chronology begins in earnest.
In 1836, Hans Christian Anderson published “The Ugly Duckling” and “The Little Mermaid.” These are the earliest animal related fairytales attributable to their actual author.
In 1871, Edward Lear penned The Owl And The Pussycat, an anthropomorphic poem. It’s unfinished sequel seems almost to anticipate the dawn of Furry Fandom.
“Our mother was the Pussy-cat, our father was the Owl, And so we're partly little beasts and partly little fowl, The brothers of our family have feathers and they hoot, While all the sisters dress in fur and have long tails to boot.”
Lewis Carroll could be considered the big bang of the modern Furry Fandom. His “Alice In Wonderland” (1865) is the first significant appearance of anthropomorphic animals in something longer than a fairytale or poem. And it continues to be a major cultural influence to this day.
In 1875, Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky began work on the ballet Swan Lake, a story about a swan that, in modern Furry lingo, “morphs” into a human being. Morphing animals are actually more common in ballets and operas than you might think, as common as they are in fairytales.
In 1890, Beatrix Potter began publishing a series of illustrated animal stories in which the art would become just as revered as the stories themselves. This would inspire the first significant wave of anthropomorphic artists.
In 1894, Rudyard Kipling penned The Jungle Book, a series of significantly advanced talking animal stories that set the stage for the lengthy allegorical animal fables of the 20th century.
In 1895, James Swinnerton began one of the earliest comic strips, “The Little Tigers,” said to have amused readers from 6 to 60. This was the beginning of a symbiotic relationship between comics and Funny Animals - the first anthropomorphic animals to appear in the funnies.
In 1896, H. G. Wells wrote The Island Of Dr. Moreau, the first science fiction novel to deal with the idea of animals acquiring human intelligence through the ill-fated scientific experimentation of man.
In 1900, L. Frank Baum published The Wonderful Wizard Of Oz - the start of one of the first great fantasy novel series. It fully explores the art of anthropomorphization. Not only are the animals anthropomorphized, but so are the plants and inanimate objects. But the most notable contribution of the Oz books to Furry Fandom is The Cowardly Lion, one of the first anthropomorphic animal characters to be believably portrayed in a live action film.
Thus you can see that, by the start of the 20th century, animal characters and anthropomorphization were well established in almost every area of the arts. No one was ever seen to gasp in surprise at the idea of a humanized animal in a cartoon, novel or stage production. Rather, people looked on these things with a sense of wonder and appreciation that is lost on our modern age, as the ability to depict intelligent animal characters in the arts has long since ceased to be unusual or difficult to achieve.
The late 1800’s and early 20th century are referred to as the “Arts & Crafts” period. This was an era of home spun art and creativity out of which many things we now take for granted in everyday life were invented. And one of the things that came out of this era was an explosion of colorfully illustrated children’s literature which seems to have been significantly dominated by adult aged artists who loved drawing animal characters with humanized features.
It’s also significant to note that these artists did not limit their anthropomorphized animals to children’s books. They also created all kinds of decorative items made to be marketed to adults. This reflects the fact that humans have a natural tendency to love animals, and thus they are also naturally drawn to cute artistic representations of the animals which are of personal fascination and significance to them.
What this says about Furry Fandom is that it is not only a normal thing that has always been at the heart of compassionate and loving human beings, it has been considered such a natural thing that nobody ever thought it needed a name. To love animals and admire their beauty through art was considered a basic part of what it meant to be human. And one of the values at the heart of most early Funny Animal books was instilling the love of nature in children.
In 1910, Howard Roger Garis kicked off his Uncle Wiggly series, which would become one of the first great Furry institutions, spawning innumerable books, a perpetually popular board game, and even some of the earliest children's records.
It is for the most part unknown by modern day Furry fans that there were, from the very early years of the 20th century, a number of writers in the field of children's literature who wrote volumes of stories in poetic verse devoted to what they called “Funny Animals.”
These were not necessarily comical stories. They were more like allegorical fables with relevant observations of human nature poetically disguised, or containing pearls of wisdom that were useful in forming a personal philosophy. They may have been intended primarily for children, but they do not read like children’s literature as we conceive it today. These are poems of outstanding quality that could be equally loved by people of any age.
For reference I have before me the 1914 book by Palmer Cox entitled “Funny Animals.” Here are some things I observe about this book.
The anthropomorphic illustrations are of a completely different style than that which would later be adopted by the animation and comic book industries. No overly large eyes or colorful fur here. Though most of the animals do walk upright and wear clothes.
These characters seem to be much more human of nature than what we, as a society, have come to think of in reference to the term “Funny Animals.” They are not toonish. They are mortal and vulnerable - intelligent and heavy of conscience. And the author has no difficulty portraying them seriously if the particular story requires it. He obviously regards them as a specific genre of literature, capable of evoking the full range of emotions.
I note that he does not restrict the concept of “Funny Animals” to creatures with fur. The first story in the book is in fact about a giant. A giant would seem to be more properly classed as a “Fabulous Monster.” But the author apparently conceives that the terms “Funny Animals” and “Fabulous Monsters” refer to the same literary genre of fantasy.
Thus this book tends to validate the positions of many Furry fans on a number of issues. It establishes the existence of a Furry interest that specifically focuses on the same range of characters that commonly fall under the modern Furry umbrella. It establishes that Furry characters were initially thought of as being a venue of serious allegorical literature, rather than indestructibly flexible cartoon comedians. And though it may be all but historically forgotten, this book may also be evidence of a Furry Fandom existing over a hundred years ago under a different name. (So little has been written on this subject that it is impossible to tell if this book represents the coining of the term "Funny Animals" or if it is a product of what might have been considered a sub-genre of children's literature at the time.)
I have a strong suspicion that Paul McCartney at one point must have read this book, Paul being a known fan of Funny Animal characters such as Rupert Bear. Think of “The White Album” and “Magical Mystery Tour” as you read this quote, “There was an old giant named Bugaboo Bill, resided in England, on top of a hill.”
It's also interesting to note that, on the cover of Magical Mystery Tour, The Beatles are wearing fursuits. They also referred to each other as animals in lyrics like, "The walrus was Paul." This suggests that the Furry literature of the early 20th century had a huge impact on the people who grew up with it. And that the idea of anthropomorphic identification with various animal types is actually rather common in our society.
Another such book of Funny Animal stories in verse published in 1939 was Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats by
T. S. Eliot. This would become the inspiration for Andrew Lloyd Webber’s ground breaking anthropomorphic musical, Cats.
The ultimate evolution of these early Funny Animal books was Dr. Suess, whose works constitute in themselves a unique world of fantasy that many people maintain an attraction to in their adult years. They also represent his unique spin on the ability of Funny Animals to communicate adult ideas in the context of children’s literature. This is best illustrated by The Butter Battle Book, a Funny Animal story that attempted to explain the philosophy of nuclear war to children.
Another early author of Funny Animal stories was Laura Rountree Smith. A quote from the preface page of her 1923 book, “Fifty Funny Animal Tales” reads as follows.
“Useful proverbs are woven into these tales. The stories will be of special use to parents and teachers who want to teach as well as to have a story for entertainment . . . They will be enjoyed by all.”
In comparison to her better known primer, “Little Bear,” which is written in short sentences to make it easy for small children to read, “Fifty Funny Animal Tales” is written in verse, like the Palmer Cox “Funny Animals” book. And, unlike the title might suggest, it is not 50 independent short stories. It is 50 intricately interlocking sections that tell a single story - each section introducing a different Funny Animal.
Though Laura Rountree Smith was obviously a prolific writer of children’s books, I could find no biography online. A general search for “Funny Animals” brings up no information on these early Funny Animal books, when the term might have been coined, nor any kind of other information on the subject.
When animation was invented in the 1910’s, the first animated character was a fabulous monster - Gertie The Dinosaur. Followed there after by Felix The Cat, Mickey Mouse, Bugs Bunny and innumerable other Funny Animal characters who pretty much dominated animation throughout the first half of the 20th century.
Animation was initially an adult fascination. Most early animated cartoons were expected to be viewed and enjoyed by adults, regardless of whether they featured Funny Animals or not. Thus, many ancient cartoons feature adult humor that pushed the limits of acceptability for their age, some of which were deemed inappropriate and banned once society began to think of cartoons as being strictly for children.
Cartoon comic strips in newspapers, from their early inception, have also been a regular part of the adult routine in our society. And since Funny Animals continue to this day to appear in comic strips regularly read by adults, it can be concluded that under certain conditions it has always been acceptable for adults to enjoy the antics of Funny Animals.
In 1913, an anthropomorphic comic strip called Krazy Kat began its run in American newspapers. The strip is notable, not only for its extreme influence on the future of Funny Animal cartooning, but because of its appeal to adults and intellectuals. The strip was actually considered to be of such great interest to adults that it was moved from the “Funnies” page to the “Art & Drama” page.
In 1923, Felix Salten took Furry literature to the next level with his novel “Bambi.”
Salten was not the first to write a serious novel about animals. More than a decade earlier Jack London had done this with “White Fang.” The major difference between “Bambi” and “White Fang” is that the animals in London’s book don’t talk. It is more an attempt to conjecture what might go on inside the heads of real animals, while letting human characters tell most of the tale. Thus it is somewhat distant from the fantasy genre.
Salten’s book is about talking animals that think and act in a distinctly human fashion. Yet it is not a comical or outlandishly fanciful story. It is heavy with violence and cruelty, plus social allegory that is unflattering to humanity and a generous helping of philosophical content.
Regardless of any misgivings you may have from seeing the Disney film version, which is little more than a loosely connected collection of scenes from the book with little of the actual story there to tie them together, the original novel was written quite seriously. This was quite possibly the first full length allegorical talking animal fable for readers of all ages. (The predecessor of “Animal Farm,” "Watership Down” and “Jonathan Livingston Seagull”) And to this day it continues to generate controversy.
It is perhaps a tribute to the power of the allegorical Furry story that “Bambi” has become more than just a novel. It is a political symbol. Besides being something that encourages people to feel compassion and open mindedness towards animals, it’s also the focal point of people like Ted Nugent who wish to propagate a very callous view regarding the sanctity of animal life. Nugent apparently regards Bambi as the enemy of his ideology. Thus Bambi is mentioned in a derogatory manner every time Nugent is interviewed.
But either view is missing entirely the point of Salten’s book. It is a feature length mature extension of the earlier Funny Animal fables by such as Palmer Cox, Aesop and Hans Christian Anderson. Salten conceived that adults could learn useful values from animal stories as well as children, and he used them to express views regarding humanity and theology. The real lesson to be learned from Bambi goes a lot deeper than just whether hunting is a good or bad thing.
Salten went on to write other Furry novels, including “Bambi's Children,” “Djibi, The Kitten,” “Perri, The Story Of A Squirrel,” “The Forest World,” “Renni The Rescuer, A Dog Of the Battlefield,” “Fifteen Rabbits,” and “Good Comrades.” This did much to open the way for later writers such as Richard Adams and Richard Bach who made the bulk of their fortunes selling Furry stories to adult readers.
In 1926, A. A. Milne introduced the Winnie The Pooh series, based on the idea of toy animals that come to life through the power of a child's imagination.
In 1930, Neil Wayne Northey began a series of books called Old Homestead Tales. This series reflects one of the earliest discovered uses of the term Furry in reference to a collective of animal characters. Specifically he repeatedly used the terms Furry Friends and Feathered Friends, capitalizing each to show that this was not an incidental use of these terms. He was either attempting to establish these terms, or reflecting a terminology that was already in use.
Which ever, the idea of Furry Friends seemed to stick, at least into the 40’s where, if you watch Walt Disney’s Bambi, you may notice that animals not addressed by proper names are addressed Friend [Animal Type.]
In the early 1930’s, the fantasy genre of L. Frank Baum met the fledgling science fiction genre of H. G. Wells. The result was Flash Gordon, a science fiction fantasy comic strip that frequently used human characters with animal attributes to represent the alien people of various planets. Among others there were lionmen, sharkmen and hawkmen.
Though there is little resemblance between these early science fiction half animal people and Funny Animals, the concept is very much the same. It is simply portrayed more seriously for an older audience. This is another indication that the idea of humanized animal characters was not considered something strictly for children’s stories. It was a literary device with the potential to enhance many different literary genres.
To this day, half human animal characters continue to appear in such sci-fi epics as Star Wars and Doctor Who. Sometimes they even take the forefront, as in the Planet Of The Apes series.
Also in the early 30's, the Gothic horror genre was coming into it’s own, featuring vampires, werewolves and cat people - all human characters who morphed into animals. This is a concept that is central to many peoples’ interest in Furry Fandom.
In 1936, Sergei Prokofiev composed Peter And The Wolf, a piece designed to teach children about the instruments of the orchestra by assigning each one an identity as an animal. A new twist on the idea of talking animals, you could say.
In the late 30’s, Furries invaded radio in the classic Old Time Radio serial The Cinnamon Bear - a one of a kind freeform fantasy romp through a world filled with more Funny Animals and fabulous monsters than Louis Carroll could shake a stick at. This was the first time Funny Animals hit it big in a non-visual medium where they couldn’t sell themselves through physical cuteness. Every individual listener probably had a distinctly different image of what a Crazy Quilt Dragon looked like. You can download the entire series here.
In 1939, a Furry cartoon called Peace On Earth was nominated for The Nobel Peace Prize. Here an anthropomorphic squirrel describes the horrors of World War 1 to a world preparing for World War 2, expressing the idea that man is doomed to destroy himself if he can not embrace the concept of peace. Click twice on the screen below to view this cartoon.
In the 1930’s and 40’s animation and comic books focused a great deal of their attention on Funny Animals. They were used to allegorically illustrate many popular and political points of view. But mainly they kept America laughing and optimistic through hard times, and they were much endeared for this service.
Much of the Funny Animal animation from this era is still in print and reasonably familiar to most people with even the slightest interest in animation. The only things that normally are obscured from that era are the war related cartoons. The sight of Bugs Bunny passing out exploding popsicles to Japanese children is no longer considered to be funny. Click twice on the screen below to see a Funny Animal war cartoon that is now banned from television.
Another interesting, if not so well known, creator of Funny Animals during this period was Paul Terry. Terry, like Tex Avery, is notable in that he had a tendency towards sexual humor gags that went far beyond the daring of Disney or Warner Brothers cartoons. This demonstrates that the idea of carrying anthropomorphics into the realms of sexual humor is hardly anything new. And, given the popularity of Mighty Mouse, one would have to conclude that the audiences of that time appreciated such humor and were not offended by it.
What most modern Furry enthusiasts have probably not seen are the wide variety of Funny Animal comics that existed during that era, many of which feature characters that are all but forgotten. These document an era of extreme competition in the creation of Funny Animal characters, such as the modern day Furry fan can only dream about. Yet it has for the most part been swept away with time, buried beneath an oppressive fascination comic collectors have with super heroes that tends to obscure everything else. The only upside to that being that it keeps the price of golden age Funny Animal comics somewhat reasonable. You can almost always find some on Ebay by searching for Funny Animal Comics. Or search for titles like Fawcett's Funny Animals,Frisky Fables,Terry-Toons, and Walter Lantz New Funnies, which are my personal favorites to collect.
In 1943, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry penned The Little Prince, a novel that combines talking animals, science fiction and idealistic philosophy. Often overlooked for its relevance to the Furry interest, "The Little Prince" is significant in that it represents an evolution from the veiled allegorical criticisms of human society found in "Bambi." It willfully uses talking animals to express the idea that humans have got the values of life all wrong.
In 1944, Olaf Stapledon wrote Sirius, a science fiction fable about a dog granted intelligence through scientific experimentation.
In 1945, E. B. White penned Stuart Little, an interesting concept about a family of humans adopting a mouse. White would go on to pen Charlotte's Web in 1952, a book that, like Bambi, is sometimes denounced as animal rights propaganda, though its intended effect seems to be more an allegory of the inevitability of mortality. White then concluded his trilogy of Furry novels with The Trumpet Of The Swan in 1973.
In 1945, George Orwell penned Animal Farm, one of the first allegorical animal novels to be recognized as a work specifically for adult readers. Like "Bambi," "Animal Farm" is often sighted as a political reference. It is, to begin with, an allegory of historical events, which it portrays in a manner that is not flattering to humanity. And it has resulted in an increased tendency to refer to the victims of oppressed governments allegorically as animals.
Pink Floyd’s 1977 album Animals demonstrates the extended impact of "Animal Farm" on politically conscious popular culture.
Throughout the 1940’s and 50’s, Furries appeared in a number of unusual tales created for the then new children’s record market. The Furry-Tales on these rare 78 RPM records usually involve some kind of practical moral, continuing the tradition of Aesop’s Fables.
Furry-Tales proved to be a medium in which more enlightened authors could instill in children moral lessons that were not acceptable in general society at the time. One such example is Herman Ermine In Rabbit Town. Here the author is obviously delivering a message to encourage racial tolerance, sneaking through the back door of 1940’s taboos by creating a story involving white rabbits and black rabbits.
The early years of television brought about a tragedy for classic animation and Funny Animal fans. As many of the early animation studios went out of business, their cartoons were sold to television. In preparing these cartoons for broadcast on black & white TV, the negatives were doctored and tinted, resulting in a large portion of our animation history being unavailable in its original state, if not irretrievably lost. Read here the fate of Paramount’s cartoons and see also the amount of Funny Animal characters from just one studio that you’ve probably never heard of.
It was only during a 40 year period, between the mid 50’s and the mid 90’s that Funny Animals or anthropomorphic characters were widely considered to be just for kids.
The cause for this period of decline is unclear. I can only conjecture that, while Funny Animals flourished during World War 2 as a part of patriotic Americana, they did not mesh with the less patriotic and more fearful era of The Cold War and The Vietnam War.
There may have been greater pressure on people to give up light hearted things during those years, and to have a deeper obsession with reality and practicality. Thus, even though some Furry cartoons continued to include adult oriented gags, they did not retain the appeal to adults that Funny Animals had enjoyed during the first half of the century.
What had greater appeal to older fantasy audiences during that period were Marvel Comics with their serious, soap opera-like involved and continuing plots. Again, this reflects an era of disturbed readers whose needs could not be filled by the absolute fantasy of Funny Animals. They needed strong heroes they could identify with to give them a feeling of empowerment, and they needed stories relevant to the problems they faced in real life.
Yet, even the super hero genre has a tendency towards anthropomorphism, and thus a connection to Furry Fandom. The most popular character to come out of Marvel Comics is Spiderman. Unlike earlier superheroes, such as Batman, Spiderman’s animal nature goes a lot deeper than the aesthetics of his costume. The premise leans more heavily on science fiction, and thus more deeply dwells on the idea of a human who acquires animal attributes.
In the 50’s, the main venue of cartoons shifted from theatrical shorts to TV programs. The first TV cartoon was Crusader Rabbit (1950) which dramatically illustrated how different TV cartoons were going to be from theatrical shorts.
TV cartoons had to be churned out much faster and on much lower budgets. But this didn’t really hurt them in terms of appeal. After all, most toons functioned very well in comic strips where they didn’t move at all. And, still being in the tail end of the golden age of radio, it was no trick to create a fully engrossing soundtrack. Actually, many radio actors would go into cartoon voiceovers at the end of the radio era. And it is still tradition today in TV cartoons to have very well produced soundtracks and voice characterizations cover for the most limited of animation.
The bulk of what went on in terms of experimentation with TV cartoons between Crusader Rabbit and the late 50’s is rather obscure. My guess is this wasn’t seen as the most practical means of providing children’s entertainment in a black & white medium. Instead, the era gave rise to something new - sock puppet shows like Kukla, Fran & Ollie and Howdy Doody. Most of which could boast at least one or two Furry characters. Shari Lewis being the most significant of these in terms of over all Furriness, as she was the only one to focus specifically on animal characterizations. While Captain Kangaroo also boasted some endearing Furry characters in prominent roles.
Both Shari Lewis And Captain Kangaroo went on to become institutions of children’s entertainment, popular throughout the rest of their lives. While other such shows that did not make prominent use of Furry character appeal proved to quickly become dated and unable to maintain popularity throughout the generations.
In 1959, Margery Sharp published the first book in The Miss Bianca series, which was a nice series of novels that no one seems to write much about these days. Though you can read lots about the Disney movies that resulted from it.
Though Funny Animals in animation and comic books were now getting boxed into the kiddy corner, that didn’t stop a live action talking horse called Mr. Ed from becoming the star of an all ages sit-com in 1961.
Some time earlier, in 1958, Ross Bagdasarian had created The Chipmunks as a novelty for Liberty Records, little knowing that his creation would become one of the longest lived institutions in Furry character history, sans the classic Disney and Warner era characters.
In 1961, The Chipmunks made the jump from records to television, and they have since made regular comebacks, repopularizing themselves for subsequent generations, both as cartoons and as a recording act.
Also in 1961, the radio institution of Amos & Andy, running since the 1920’s and still on the air at this point, had failed to make the transition to television, due to the problem of the black radio characters having been voiced by white actors. Freeman Gosden and Charles Correll still wanted to do something in television with their ethnic voice characterizations. So animation was the next logical thing to try. And how best to sneak past the rising disapproval of ethnic characterizations than to voice Furry characters. Hence Amos & Andy became Furries in the series Calvin and the Colonel.
The 60’s also saw the first explosion of anime in America. Anime came riding in on the popularity of a childishly corny, but intensely loveable little robot called Astro Boy. But Astro Boy’s creator, Osamu Tezuka, a life long fan of American comics and animation, was quick to turn his attention to Funny Animals. His “Kimba The White Lion,” repeated the success of Astro Boy and was Japan’s first color television cartoon. (More about Kimba later)
However, Tezuka also had a background in science fiction. And he viewed the Funny Animal genre far more seriously than anyone in the American TV networks could understand at the time. He was constantly concerned with plot, continuity, art, and above all, projecting messages of world importance.
To this end, Tezuka produced another series featuring animal characters called Amazing 3. (Wonder 3 in Japan) “Amazing 3” tells the story of three aliens who come to Earth and disguise themselves as a horse, a bunny and a duck. Their mission is to evaluate if humanity is a threat to galactic peace. And should they determine that humanity is too violent and corrupt to be allowed to survive, they have with them a bomb that will destroy the planet.
“Amazing 3” is legendary in Furry Fandom - legendary because very few have actually seen it. All master prints of the original American dubs have been lost, leaving only a handful of episodes preserved on primitive video tape recorders available to collectors.
In the late 60’s, underground counter culture comic books began poking fun at old established icons by using them in adult oriented satire comics, which often featured nudity and bad language. One of the icons they made prominent use of was Funny Animals, and one of the most popular titles in counter culture comics was “Fritz The Cat” by Robert Crumb.
Just as the works of Felix Salten, George Orwell, Richard Adams and Richard Bach form the main justification for a genre of adult oriented intellectual Furry literature, the counter culture underground Funny Animal comics of the late 60’s and early 70’s established a precedent for an adult sexually oriented Furry comics movement some 20 years later. They proved that Funny Animals could not only appeal to children, intellectuals and sci-fi fans. They could also appeal to sexually liberated mature audiences.
In 1970, Richard Bach penned Jonathan Livingston Seagull. This intensely popular best seller fully explores the ideas of theological allegory that are hinted at in “Bambi,” doing so without the childish tendencies of “The Little Prince.” There is no question in this book that the author is speaking directly to adults and attempting to broaden their philosophy by expanding on New Age interpretation of religious ideals and metaphysical theories.
At this point, one might ask, why are animal stories like "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" and "Animal Farm" so effective in communicating ideas to adults that they would not sit still for in any other form? How is it possible that serious adults, so far removed from the fairytales of their youth, see so much of themselves in animal characters?
Perhaps it is because the animal story can not be seen as so directly critical of one’s personal life, as it would if the characters were human. Or perhaps there is such an air of strangeness to imagining these ideas being spoken by animals that it fascinates the reader into unlocking a normally closed mind. More likely the reader is fascinated to find himself seeing life through the eyes of some other creature whom he knows he should feel no empathy for, and yet somehow finding the experience quite vivid and emotional.
Regardless of such speculation, "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" is historically important to the Furry interest, as it is a successful philosophical and religious work that effectively brought the ancient idea of the Furry fable into the realms of modern ideology.
In 1972, Richard Adams penned Watership Down. It is one of the most referenced examples in Furry Fandom among those who attempt to explain the Furry interest. It achieved a new extreme in allegorical literature through its extensive development of a unique culture for an animal species, requiring a glossary of unique words peculiar to rabbit language and extensive glimpses into the culture, religion and sociology of the rabbits.
To this day Furry Fandom stands in awe of this book, and most serious Furry authors measure their work against it, few daring even to aspire to such literary achievement and popular acclaim.
Also in 1972, the art rock band Genesis released an album called Foxtrot. On the cover of Foxtrot was an anthropomorphic fox. Given the penchant of many art rock bands to display influences from early children’s literature, this was not surprising. What was shocking was that Peter Gabriel walked out on stage and performed dressed as a female anthropomorphic fox. Furry tunes by Genesis include White Mountain, All In A Mouse’s Night, and Squonk.
In 1973, another art rock band, Jethro Tull, inserted a six minute narrative into their album A Passion Play called The Hare Who Lost His Spectacles. Incorporated into the stage performance of the album was a film of the band members dressed in anthropomorphic costumes, humorously acting out the story. A song omitted from the album that would appear on their next release would become one of the most popular Furry tunes of all time, Bungle In The Jungle. Other animal songs omitted from "A Passion Play" appear on a collection of unreleased works called "Nightcap," including Law of the Bungle and Look At The Animals.
In 1973, Marvel comics suffered it’s own close encounter with a new kind of Funny Animal when Howard The Duck, a character created as a gag, took off and became an unexpected star of The Marvel Universe.
In this way, Marvel Comics became custodian of one of the first Funny Animal characters in comics to attract a more mature audience without an R rating. Unfortunately it would seem that the Marvel company has never known what to do with this oddity. And the character’s creator expresses the opinion that Marvel generally fumbled the ball and prevented Howard The Duck from exploring its full potential.
Furry literature of a more juvenile nature also continued to flourish in the decades following World War 2, progressively experimenting with drawing aspects of popular adult genres into children’s literature. Examples: The Chronicles Of Narnia (Sword & Sorcery) The Miss Bianca Series (Spy Fiction) Mrs. Frisby & The Rats Of NIMH (Science Fiction.)
This sort of thing baffles most literary critics as they attempt to rationalize Furry as a genre. Furries seem capable of easily crossing into any other genre, and it’s a mystery to some how one genre can effectively include all other genres within itself. The elusive solution is that no matter what genre Furry actors tackle, the very presence of talking animals takes that genre into an alternate reality where even a historical drama based on fact becomes Furry fantasy. The need to explain new types of fandoms of such an expansive nature has spawned a new word, metagenre.
Yet, though Furries have never had a problem being accepted in any kind of feature aimed specifically at children, they have enjoyed limited success appealing to other audiences. The idea of Funny Animals remains a forbiddon concept in many mature and conservative minds.
The most sure fire way to get practical adults to sit up and take notice of Furry, or any other kind of comics, alternative literature or animation is to give it a World War 2 theme. Such as the Japanese manga comic “Barefoot Gen” or the Furry comic Maus. These not only get respect from adults, they win awards. Unfortunately this still fails to get the message across to most adults that the ability of comics, cartoons and Funny Animals to tell serious stories is not a one time fluke. It’s something that has been proven many times over the course of the 20th century.
In the post Vietnam War years of the 70’s the counter culture fell, and there was a general decline in artistic output all around. Children’s entertainment in general suffered a period of cheap, poorly produced comics and cartoons that rarely held up to what had been accomplished in previous decades. And the idea of fantasy for adults was rarely even suggested.
For a period of about 3 or 4 years the world struggled to rationalize its post war/post counter culture identity. Thus the mid 70’s are remembered best for benign disco and sit-coms. This was the death of cosmic philosophies, fear of government and a desperate need to change the world. With all that gone, the youth of the upcoming generation found itself in need of new obsessions.
In 1978, Jethro Tull released a Furry concept album called Heavy Horses. Each of the songs on the album is either about an animal or has an animal hidden somewhere in the lyrics. The opening song, “The Mouse Police Never Sleeps,” refers to the anthropomorphic characters in the song as “Little Furry Folk.”
“Furry Folk” was not a new term. Collective animal societies in children’s literature had been referred to as “Furry Folk” as far back as the 1920’s. But this Jethro Tull song, as well as a line of animal puppets which began production around the same time, called The Furry Folk Puppets, demonstrate that the term “Furry” was gaining popularity in the 70’s.
The trailer for the 1973 re-release of Disney’s “Cinderella” also makes reference to Cinderella’s “Furry Friends.” Genesis also uses the term “Furry” in their song “Squonk.”
These and other examples show that the term “Furry” was around in the 70’s and gaining popularity as a master term for fantasy animal characters. It was never officially coined, but just naturally seemed to work it's way into the vocabulary as a descriptive term.
In the late 70’s an explosive renaissance of fantasy began to be seen, much of it having Furry implications. The first “Star Wars” movie was produced, “Elfquest” began publication, Piers Anthony began his Xanth series, Role Playing Games were invented, and Furry characters began returning to children’s cartoons in perfusion, displacing the super heroes that had dominated Saturday morning TV for nearly a decade.
The new generation was finding its niche. The world was no longer something to be saved. It was something to be escaped from through fantasy and science fiction. And once marketers stopped thinking of fantasy as something strictly for small children, the stage was set for a new era in which fantasy would remain a serious part of many peoples’ lives as they matured into adulthood and beyond.
In 1984, DIC produced one of the most overlooked milestones in anthropomorphic cartoons, The Get Along Gang.
Based on a collection of anthropomorphic characters created for the American Greetings company, The Get Along Gang was one of the first shows to demonstrate a world of half animal humans, similar to the worlds that later were established for adult comics like Shanda The Panda.
This was not the first time an anthropomorphic cartoon world had been created. It was actually quite common to do this back during the 30’s and 40’s. But The Get Along Gang was different in that it was not a completely slapstick series where it is easy to get lost in the laughter and forget to ask questions like, “Is there a logical premise for this world of animal people?” “Is this some other planet where this kind of mixed life form is natural?” Or, “Was this once a purely human species that was corrupted by animal experimentation or genetic warfare?”
Another such show that begged the viewer to ask questions that the producers of the show never answered was My Little Pony. This serialized adventure show seemed to tease its more thoughtful viewers with a number of tricky concepts that would have elevated the show beyond its targeted age group if they were explored.
One thing I always wondered about was the idea of the character Megan traveling back and forth between the real world and Ponyland, finding the pony society changed every time she returned and the entire cast of ponies completely replaced. People of practical mind would say, “Aww, that just meant that Hasbro brought out a new line of toys.” But a science fiction writer like myself could not help seeing it as two parallel time zones moving at different speeds, causing Megan to witness the birth and death of multiple generations of ponies. Also, the fact that pony society was pretty much all female invited considerable curiosity about their mating practices.
This was the main difference between the Funny Animal explosion of the 30’s & 40’s and the Funny Animal explosion of the 80’s. The new shows could be portrayed with much more seriousness and drama. In that less hysterical atmosphere it was possible for people to stop and contemplate the concepts. And as the original viewers of those shows grew older, their memories of the shows and their personal feelings for the characters grew up with them. This has resulted in a flood of adult oriented fan fiction which explore and expand upon the concepts they came up with to fill in those things that were never explained.
Like the cartoons and comics of the 30’s and 40’s, the Saturday morning cartoons in the 80’s offered far too many Furry titles to document here. Some of the more significant titles included, Shirt Tails, The Puppy’s Great Adventures, Monchichis, the animated Ewoks series, Popples, Care Bears, and so on. 
Another such cartoon that had significant impact on Furry fans was Chip N Dale’s Rescue Rangers, mainly because of the character Gadget, who was seen by many Furry fans as embodying a previously unexplored level of attractiveness in anthropomorphics. This would later inspire many adult Furry fans to have a particular fondness for anthropomorphic female mice, resulting in the creation of an erotic art site called “Playmouse.”
Another character of significance was Cleo of The Cadillac Cats. Whereas Gadget was simply cute, Cleo had a visible sexuality, while wearing no clothing other than her leg warmers. Today there is a sphere of thought that this constitutes nudity. But that notion did not exist back then. It has not been until very recently that any animal character covered in fur could be thought of as nude. But then, anthropomorphic animals had rarely had such human looking bodies before. And it would not be long before numerous fans were noticing the potential sexuality of Furry characters and experimenting with more adult oriented Furry story, comic and art content.
Simultaneous to the Saturday morning Furry explosion of the 80’s, the world of comics was enjoying a previously unheard of explosion of independent publishing companies, most of which had their sights fixed on an age group higher than the Saturday morning cartoon crowd. Yet the allure of Funny Animals was not lost on these independent publishers who soon began churning out titles like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,Albedo,Usagi Yojimbo,Cutey Bunny, Critters and Omaha The Cat Dancer.
These ranged from titles that were eventually adapted for younger audiences to titles that were entirely age restricted. They tend to reflect a lot of interests relative to older people. “Cutey Bunny” in particular pays almost continual homage to nostalgia icons that one would have been expected to be at least in one’s 20’s to even know about, if not in one's 40's. “Usagi Yojimbo” reflects the earliest form of anime fandom in America, which was only accessible at the time to people who could understand Japanese or had the patience to read subtitles. “Albedo” seriously attempted to reach out to a mature science fiction audience. “Omaha The Cat Dancer” firmly re-established the potential of Funny Animals in sexually oriented underground comics. While “Ninja Turtles” shocked everyone by becoming a major popular phenomenon.
But, for those who desired Furry entertainment of an intellectually mature nature, the best place to be in the 80’s was the fantasy novel market.
One of the first successful fantasy authors of this new era to make prominent use of Furry characters and concepts was Piers Anthony, who at one time had at least three series going simultaneously that featured all manner of talking animals and human animal hybrids.
The Xanth series, begun in 1978 and running to the present day, dealt with a magical world that was populated by all manner of fanciful animal/human combinations. The Apprentice Adept, begun in 1980, dealt with such controversial subject matter as a human marrying a morphing unicorn. The Mode series, begun in 1991, dealt with a talking horse with the power to traverse time and space.
Alan Dean Foster then followed suit in 1983 with his Spellsinger series, which was more specifically focused on half animal anthropomorphic characters who walked upright and wore clothes.
In 1985, Tad Williams penned Tailchaser’s Song, the first offering to challenge Richard Adams’ place as the undisputed master of Furry Fiction.
Williams, while repeating Richard Adams’ formula of creating a culture and language for his cats, demonstrated a background in types of fantasy that are more popular with the sci-fi fantasy novel crowd. But most significantly, he proved that Richard Adams and Richard Bach were not a fluke, and that serious Furry Fiction for adults was bate for the best seller list.
In 1986 Brian Jacques began his Redwall series, one of the longest running Furry novel series, which continues to this day. Redwall is an outstanding icon of modern Furry culture. Those who have read it speak of it with a kind of reverence. Those who have not read it wonder what the big deal is. Unfortunately, I fall into the latter category. The most I can gather is that it’s a series that greatly resembles the formula of “The Lord Of The Rings,” every story dealing with wars, battles and quests in a medieval Furry setting. And, given the hype that surrounds "Lord Of The Rings," I can see why this would get a lot of attention.
These offerings of freeform fantasy were the genre of Lewis Carroll and L. Frank Baum grown up. It was the Furry interest returning to its roots in novels to re-establish itself. And to this day the fantasy novel market is the one place where intellectually mature stories about talking animals and mythical beasts flourish. More Furry novels.
At this point I have not given much attention to live action Furry films in my chronology, though there are a number of them. One that defies omission is Ladyhawke. (1985) Most live action Furry movies are either childish, comical or in the Gothic horror genre. Seldom do you find one that stands out as a unique Furry classic, but this is definitely one of them.
The plethora of Furry characters created in the 80’s indoctrinated a whole new generation to the attractiveness of Furry fantasy, as well as its potential to appeal to adults. It was around this time that certain individuals on the internet and at comics conventions began attempting to unite the fandom for this genre.
Those on the net who have written chronologies of significant events in the history of Furry Fandom often cite Kimba The White Lion (1965) and Disney’s Robin Hood (1973) as being the pivotal events that got them into Furry Fandom, rarely if ever acknowledging more than a century of previous experimentation and development in the Furry arts. This reflects the age groups that dominate the online Furry Community. Few are old enough to have experienced much of the Furry entertainment that existed before Kimba.
Furry fans as old as myself and older exist in great abundance throughout the world, but older people are often computer illiterate and don't travel in circles that would bring them into contact with the online Furry Community. Thus, most chronologies to be found on the net are incomplete and subject to the personal experience of the individual writers. However, the titles they cite often do reflect important advances in the Furry interest.
For myself, I can say that Kimba The White Lion had significant impact on me in my youth and is one of the major reasons I have had an obsessive interest in Furry stories for most of my 45 years.
Kimba is significant in that he was the first anthropomorphic cartoon animal to set forward a personal morality contrary to the human norm and preach it to millions of children. “Eating animals is wrong,” Kimba said time after time. Treating animals differently because of species was also wrong in Kimba’s theology. Humans placing themselves above animals was wrong. And so forth and so on.
Unlike Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Kimba was not passive about sharing his ideology. Kimba got up in your face and preached his moral edicts with a roar and extended claws to silence anyone who challenged his endeavors to prove that all creatures, human and animal alike, could live together in peace without killing each other. He even went so far as to insist that the predator animals eat veggie burgers.
Truly I’ve felt guilty all my life for my diet because of that show. If my parents would have supported my efforts to do so I’d probably have grown up a vegetarian. But, even if I couldn’t live up to that particular ideal of Kimba’s, other things he preached have stayed with me and influence me to this day. Note the comment on my personal stats page, “Justice must always be served and the weak must always be defended.” That’s part of the impression Kimba left on me. Actually, in terms of impact on children, Kimba just plain beats the stuffing out of “The Lion King.”
When I was a child watching this, I took it very seriously. I never thought of Kimba as being in the same context as more toonish animals like Bugs Bunny. I looked on it as a demonstration of how you evaluate the righteousness of your own actions and justifications by looking at them from the perspective of those who suffer because of your lifestyle.
It was not until the other day when I was showing some episodes of Kimba to a friend who was curious about the “Lion King” controversy that I realized just how toonish and funny that show was. Watching an adult aged person who had never seen the show before doubling over in hysterics at things I had never before realized were gags was quite a revelation. It seems that the show is a laugh fest for adults, but it can be a life altering experience for children who are so overwhelmed by its condemnation of their everyday activities that they completely miss the humor.
The question that now runs through my mind is how many other children my age watched this show, hanging on Kimba’s every word as gospel, and thus developed an uncommon sympathy for animal characters.
As far as Disney’s Robin Hood is concerned, it may well have been for many people an eye opening experience in the art of anthropomorphics. But it was hardly the first such anthropomorphic film, nor the first time anthropomorphic characters had been drawn with extreme cuteness and sex appeal.
If there was anything unique about Disney’s Robin Hood, it was the fact that the hero and heroine were anthropomorphic foxes, and Furry fans seem to have an unusual soft spot for foxes. Previously animals like foxes were rarely portrayed in a positive light. Thus, Disney’s Robin Hood may have indoctrinated many modern day Furry creators to the idea of completely divorcing half human animal characters from their relative roles in nature and granting them the personal choice of whether to be heroes or villains.
Others cite The Secret Of NIMH (1982) as the significant event that got them into the fandom. Though this was only one of a number of attempts during that time period to create animated Furry fantasy films with previously unheard of adult appeal. Others included Watership Down (1978), The Plague Dogs (1982), The Flight Of Dragons (1982) and The Last Unicorn (1982).
What set The Secret Of NIMH apart from those other films was that it did not attempt to distance itself from Disney style cuteness in its effort to reach out to a more mature audience.
While the other films wowed audiences with their fascinating stories, The Secret Of NIMH wowed audiences not only with a fascinating, inspiring and socially relevant story, its visual effects and the expressive appearance of its characters threatened to elevate animation to a whole new level that would have been irresistible to adult fantasy fans.
One has to wonder how either the book or the movie was allowed to be published. The NIMH story is absolutely unique in Children’s literature in that its entire concept revolves around open criticism of actual activities going on at a real US Government institution, The National Institute Of Mental Health. And if you think in terms of the stem cel research that is probably going on there at this moment, causing all kinds of debates about how it’s immoral because it might raise the intelligence level of animals, “The Secret Of NIMH” should be by far the most controversial animated film ever made.
But if the government was in any way offended by the book or the film, they were smart to stay quiet about it. From what I’ve seen most fans seem incognizant of the fact that there really is a NIMH, or that, if you live in Maryland as I do, it's disturbingly accessible to the rosebush in your backyard.
All anyone seems to see is an outstanding display of animation craftsmanship and a cast of exceptionally endearing characters. Here a fan interviews Don Bluth Studios about NIMH. Note that he asks about everything but the relationship to the real world institution.
For some reason, the great advance in animation for adults promised by "The Secret Of NIMH" never materialized. In fact, there was a general disrespect and misunderstanding of the film. Certain theaters didn’t even bother to put the title on their marquees. Instead they billed it simply as “Kiddy Film."
Yet, for those like myself who saw it and understood the potential it represented, “The Secret Of NIMH” was a privately heralded event, both as an elevation of animation itself and of the Furry interest.
It was perhaps because of the poor reception for this film that Don Bluth gave up his lofty ideals and basically became the other Disney after that. All subsequent attempts at adult oriented animation in America were poorly produced and had little impact.
Meanwhile, over in Japan, Osamu Tezuka, who had originally given us Kimba, carried on the torch of elevating both the Furry interest and animation for adults. American audiences to this day have not seen most of his efforts. But the end result was that Japan got the mature animation industry that so many American fantasy fans longed for. While America tenaciously held on to its tradition of the kid friendly family oriented animated musical Furry tale.
One of the most significant of Tezuka’s Furry ventures was Bagi, The Monster Of Mighty Nature. (1984) This was possibly the first appearance of a seriously portrayed half human anthropomorphic character in a film with a firm science fiction concept. Bagi, the character, is pretty much a prototype for the style of mature anthropomorphic characters the new adult oriented Furry Community would develop and promote.
Another of Tezuka’s Furry creations which actually made it to America was Unico. (1981) Unico is a curious mix of "Kimba The White Lion" and "The Secret Of NIMH." It retains an extreme element of cuteness and innocence that most people would say is beyond the tolerance of anyone but a child to enjoy. Yet the stories in the Unico series are so dramatic, emotional, suspenseful and executed without homage to the Disney formula that the films stand out as elevations of both animation and the Furry interest.
In 1990, Samurai Pizza Cats became the last major Funny Animal title of the 80’s explosion. Beyond that point, children’s television, as well as just about all segments of popular culture, would fall into a self proclaimed state of Grunge, in which any type of cuteness was seen as offensive. Thus fans of cute art forms were driven underground.
As the 80’s drew to a close, the first attempts to market manga in America took place. These attempts failed miserably, but a growing awareness of anime in America started a niche fandom, identical to Furry Fandom at that time - small, unrecognized and hardly visible.
Moving into the 90’s, the two movements grew together. Both Furry and Manga were considered part of an arsenal of styles available to independent comic artists. And soon artists who specialized in one or the other would find themselves working at the same companies, and sometimes on the same titles.
Comic stores soon began to think of Manga and Furry as part of the same art movement, and it was rare to see them separated into different sections. Throughout most of the 90’s this proved a very pleasant and productive partnership.
The title which best exemplified the relationship between the Anime and Furry genres in the 90’s was Fred Perry’s Gold Digger. Though obviously a Furry title, both "Gold Digger" and it’s creator were staples of the Anime/Manga scene in America at that time. Thus, much of the popularity of "Gold Digger" was credited to the Anime scene, and the Furry scene ended up not getting much credit for what was one of its more respectable titles during that period.
Another title which showed the relationship between the American Manga and Furry scenes was Ninja High School. Princess Asrial first appears in the story as an alien anthropomorphic skunk who is transformed into a human when she visits Earth. While on Earth life is one long succession of Anime clichés, but when the storyline moves to Asrial’s planet the entire cast becomes Furry.
Meanwhile, from the Japanese end of the spectrum, a number of the Anime titles that were gaining an underground following in America had serious Furry implications. There was Ranma ½, an animated sit-com about martial artists who turn into animals when they get wet. There was Yu Yu Hakusho, in which one of the main characters is a spirit fox. There was Tonde Buurin (Super Pig) a super hero parody about a girl who transforms into a super powered anthropomorphic pig. There was Cat Girl Nuku Nuku, a sci-fi comedy in which the brain of a dying cat is transplanted into the body of an android. There was Di Gi Charat with its bizarre little aliens who dress and talk like animals. There was Dominion Tank Police with The Puma Sisters. There was Dream Hunter REM with her cute dog and kitty companions who transform into her mighty Furry spirit guardians. There was Ko Century Beastketteers about anthropomorphic animals with mecha totems. And Slayers provided a number of anthropomorphic characters in the supporting cast, including Jillas The Fox and Filia The Dragon Girl.
Throughout the 80’s and early 90’s, the mainstream adult fantasy market had grown to ridiculous proportions. Both Anime and Furries were known to exist in the general fantasy and sci-fi circles that developed, but they tended to be disrespected, misunderstood, underrated and ignored by those groups.
Thus, in the mid 90’s, came the great push to force into the spotlight both Anime and Furry materials that would appeal to the mature fantasy market’s well known attraction to sex and violence. The result of this was that the first thing many people saw of Anime and Furries was explicit, child restricted material.
Though great effort went into the non-explicit Furry anthology series Furrlough, and though “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,” “Albedo” and “Usagi Yojimbo” had provided precedent for the development of a legitimate Furry comics market for readers of all ages, it was sexually oriented titles like Tank Vixens,Shanda The Panda, Katmandu and Genus that most visibly represented the adult Furry comic book market in the 90's. While simultaneously, the American Anime distributors actively worked to keep titles like Sailor Moon from being accepted, in favor of titles that included extreme sex and violence.
This has resulted in something of a prejudice, causing many to think that the whole point of the Furry and Anime interests is sexy eye candy and bloody violence. And it remains difficult for most of the uninitiated to grasp how any kind of cartoon story can appeal to adults on the basis of cerebral or dramatic content.
After Sailor Moon hit it big in America, Anime gained exposure rapidly, while simultaneously comic publishers started losing interest in Furry. And Furry Fandom had no other consistent venue of professional products of a mature nature. Thus The Furry Community found itself in a struggle for survival, and it fled to the internet as a means for the fans to supply each other's needs.
However, in spite of the split, to this day many venders at Anime cons consider anthropomorphic comics to be part of the normal sphere of interest for a significant number of Manga enthusiasts. While a significant number of today’s Furry artists display obvious Anime/Manga influences. Though now somewhat estranged, the two art movements remain siblings.
In 1996, Anime unleashed the last major Furry phenomenon on the world to date. It was called Pokemon. The incredibly popular video and card game, coupled with the TV show, took the world by storm and still has yet to completely run its course.
Interestingly, the Beanie Babies craze swept the world around the same time. To parents at that time it must have seemed as if their kids had all gone Furry.
Since then, one of the most notable venues of Furry entertainment has been video games, with titles such as Pokemon, Sonic The Hedgehog and Star Fox maintaining popularity. And the feature film market has enjoyed great success with such titles as Madagascar, The Wild, and Over The Hedge.
Furry characters seem ideally suited to the new 3 dimensional animation formats, and this bodes well for a future full of Furry fun to come.
Meanwhile, the age old tradition of the Furry comic strip continues in a wide variety of free comics that are available on line.
Below you will find links to some of my personal favorite Furry comics and stories on the net. Please note that much of what is created for the net is adult of nature. Adult of nature does not always equate to explicit content. Much of this stuff is down right innocent and charming. But some may include adult language, controversial subject matter, or Furry nudity (which I personally think is an oxymoron.) I will not include here anything that I consider to be more graphic than my own series.
This is a new section of this page that I'm just starting. More links to come. Suggestions welcome.